Close

Articles Posted in Criminal Law

Updated:

Washington Community Custody Condition Limiting Geographic Movement Was Unconstitutionally Vague

Sentences for certain Washington criminal offenses may include community custody.  The specific conditions of a defendant’s community custody depend on the offense for which the defendant was convicted.  In some circumstances, certain community custody conditions are mandatory, some may be waived by the court, and others are discretionary.  In a…

Updated:

Washington Supreme Court Addresses Sentencing of Juvenile Offenders With Plea Agreements

Pursuant to State v. Houston-Sconiers, a trial court must consider the mitigating qualities of a juvenile offender’s youth in sentencing a juvenile in a Washington criminal case.  The court has discretion to impose a sentence below the standard range in juvenile cases.  In a recent case, a juvenile defendant challenged…

Updated:

Washington Appeals Court Considers Application of Multiple Transaction Aggravator in Drug Case Sentencing

A court may only impose a sentence above the standard range in a Washington criminal case if it finds substantial and compelling reasons that justify it.  This finding must be based on specific aggravating circumstances that have been determined beyond a reasonable doubt by the jury.  In drug trafficking cases,…

Updated:

Washington Appeals Court Concludes Physical Control Statute Is Not Unconstitutionally Vague

Generally, a Washington criminal law must be sufficiently specific to notify an ordinary person of what conduct it prohibits and provide ascertainable standards of guilt to prevent arbitrary enforcement.  In a recent case, a defendant challenged the statute prohibiting being in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under…

Updated:

Washington Appeals Court Overturns Felony Violation of A Court Order Conviction

Pursuant to RCW 7.105.450(1)(a), a violation of a Washington domestic violence protection order is generally a gross misdemeanor. A violation can be a felony, however, if it constitutes an assault “that does not amount to assault in the first or second degree.” RCW 7.105.450(4). In a recent unpublished case, a…

Updated:

Washington Appeals Court Addresses Accomplice Liability vs. Rendering Criminal Assistance

A Washington appeals court recently addressed the difference between rendering criminal assistance and accomplice liability in a case in which a defendant appealed her convictions for being an accomplice to second degree burglary and third degree theft. The state alleged the defendant acted as an accomplice to a woman in…

Updated:

Dismissal of Washington Criminal Charges Pursuant to a Knapstad Motion

A Washington criminal defendant may file a Knapstad motion to dismiss criminal charges due to insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of the crime.  Along with the motion, the defendant must submit a supporting affidavit or declaration that alleges there are no material facts in dispute and stating…

Updated:

Washington Appeals Court Reverses Juvenile Adjudication of Interference with a Health Care Facility

A juvenile recently challenged guilty adjudications arising from her actions while being detained and forcibly changed into scrubs at the hospital. According to the appeals court’s unpublished opinion, a deputy went to the high school because the juvenile refused to leave the school.  The juvenile made statements about suicide and…

Updated:

Washington Appeals Court Reverses Rendering Criminal Assistance Conviction for Insufficient Evidence

Video can be important evidence in a Washington criminal case.  A defendant recently challenged his convictions in which video surveillance footage played a significant part. According to the unpublished opinion of the appeals court, the police department received a report of a shot fired at a motel.  The person who…

Updated:

Washington Breath Test Admissible Despite “Strands” of Tobacco in Defendant’s Mouth

To admit evidence of a breath test in a Washington criminal case, the state must produce prima facie evidence of certain facts, including that the tested person did not have any foreign substances in their mouth in the fifteen minutes before the test. RCW 46.61.506. The state can make this…

Contact Us